🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are exploring similar bans.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that phones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". A law could be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to pass a proposal raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is given. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a solid starting point," commented the parliamentarian behind the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any action must be "supported by conclusive data".

Last year, interest built behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. However, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after being exposed to harmful online content contends that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is mostly happening at the local level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills mandating parental consent for under-16s to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain politicians to mimic this example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Apart from the West, further states are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more measured position. Unicef has warned that social media bans have downsides and "might backfire". The agency points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

As this worldwide discussion evolves, the actions of Australia and several other countries show that governments around the world are less and less willing to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.